Search for: "STATE v. ABAT" Results 521 - 540 of 960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2016, 10:23 am by admin
Town of Milton Board of Health v. [read post]
  Generally, one subdivision of state government cannot sue another subdivision of state government under these clauses. [read post]
  Generally, one subdivision of state government cannot sue another subdivision of state government under these clauses. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsLinda Huff Browder, Appellant,v.Cecil Ray Browder, Jr., Respondent. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Paradis stated that the default rule, set by Supreme Court precedent in Lijeberg v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The complaint further alleges that the defendant’s negligence proximately caused the plaintiffs to sustain actual and ascertainable damages in lost rent and in settling the action brought by the Hive, and thus, validly states a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 443; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847; Wolstencroft v Sassower, 124 AD2d 582). [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
One may ratify assumptions of power, extinguish debts, wipe out wrongs, and confirm rights, by the directions of one's will (Bizzey v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm by Yishai Schwartz
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]