Search for: "STATE v. DOUGLAS"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Facility Warden, 112 AD3d 1350, 1351 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 864 [2014]), and it "is not of the type that typically evades review" (Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Facility Warden, 112 AD3d 1350, 1351 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 864 [2014]), and it "is not of the type that typically evades review" (Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]). [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the place within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630; Jackson, J., dissenting in Beauharnais v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:15 am
Professor Douglas K. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 11:43 am
From Mastriano v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
BURGER, CJ, publicación, p. 207, DOUGLAS, J., publicación, p. 209, y STEWART, J., post, p. 167, suscriben opiniones concurrentes. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:29 pm
Last week, in an unpublished Order (Jonathon Hinton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:10 am
" In Elonis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
The State applied to or Courts of that State shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character or not. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 12:31 pm
State v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 20 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in an proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
