Search for: "STATE v. SUEING"
Results 521 - 540
of 14,826
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
They sue for fraudulent inducement and promissory estoppel.The case is Cordova v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
See Doe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Our nomination for the most intriguing case of the last Supreme Court term is Mallory v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
—Abraham Lincoln 1Thornton Hamilton v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
August 25, 2023 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in FTC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:49 am
Watkins cited Ronnie Lee Johnson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
But to be effective these ought to focus on targeted states rather than on the modalities of leading state self-actualization. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:45 am
One of the more frequently cited cases, Borough of Kenilworth v . [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
I disagreed with key parts of her Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:13 pm
Currently pending before the United States Supreme Court is the matter of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
One such example is that of Bennett v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
It is true that in past cases concerning joint liability of the EU and a Member State the Court has hinted that the claimant should sue the Member State first, and only sue the EU if the first action does not result in full compensation. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
Flora et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Constitution, what is the likely outcome if the person sues under New Jersey law? [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:31 pm
See Navrides v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Ross; Moore v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:43 am
In the subject of this blog, Miller v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
A settlement with only the class-action lawyers would have been of little value to Google if the state AGs had continued to sue on behalf of their citizens. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
While the Genetic Information Privacy Act lacks a private right of action (this means consumers don’t have the power to sue companies for violating the law), it does provide the state attorney general with authority to enforce the law and allows the AG to recover both actual and statutory damages as well as attorney’s fees. [read post]
