Search for: "STATE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 521 - 540
of 102,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
United States, No. 09-989. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:30 pm
The United States Sentencing Commission filed an amicus brief in support of the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:41 am
United States, though I suspect that the Court will not address my primary raison d'excitation. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 11:07 am
United States, which presents the question whether the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are binding when a district court imposes a new sentence pursuant to a revised guideline range under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:41 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:41 pm
United States. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V concerns capital punishment. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:15 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
PROTOCOL TO THE TREATY BETWEEN ROMANIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS OVERVIEW The Protocol to the Treaty between Romania and the United States of America on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (the ‘‘Protocol’’) serves to implement, as between the United States and Romania, the provisions of the 2003 Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance between the United… [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:08 am
A recent United States Supreme Court case, Byrd v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:08 am
A recent United States Supreme Court case, Byrd v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:29 am
Canadians that need a US visa to enter the United States There are some Canadians who may need a visa to enter the United States, including the E, A, G, V and the K-series of visas. [read post]
