Search for: "STRAND v. US " Results 521 - 540 of 647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:35 am
The mother wrote at the time of Lorna’s nomination: “She believed what I was saying and was relentless in getting more information on hair strand testing and helping me challenge the results. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Events and Broadcasts No events for next week have been reported to us. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:35 am by Lawrence Taylor
 This was later confirmed by the Court in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Wrongfully destroying, sinking, stranding or causing the loss of a vessel at sea; d. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a very brief summary of that strand: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am by David Hart QC
Now to the South African case, the simplified title of which (Biowatch v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
”Seager v Copydex, relied upon by Vestergaard and the Judge, was distinguished on the basis that there the defendants were actually using the information, albeit unconsciously. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
But still the rumours persist: whispers around the hearthside, hushed conversations in ale-houses, and meek utterances made through the froth of lattes and macchiatos consumed on the Strand. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:40 pm by Chris Cheatham
The contract documents permitted the use of Parallel Strand Lumber -- or Parallams -- for the roof truss system, columns and beams.  [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:40 pm by Chris Cheatham
  The contract documents permitted the use of Parallel Strand Lumber -- or Parallams -- for the roof truss system, columns and beams. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am by Marko Milanovic
It is primarily this tension which explains the conflicting strands of case law across several jurisdictions. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Historically 'stranded capital', in the ireprressible language of utility regulation. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:59 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: CG v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am by Matthew Flinn
In essence its legal argument had two main strands. [read post]