Search for: "Sacks v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration         Number           Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
  To make matters worse she looks like she fell out of the ugly tree and got pummelled with a sack of nickels when she hit the bottom. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Joey Fishkin
 Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm by eorozco
At a recent press conference with White House Crypto and AI Czar David Sacks, Sen. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Private equity firms buy businesses b/c of the brand, sack the workforce, find cheaper ways of making thing [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:51 pm by Harold O'Grady
In the 16th Century Pope Sixtus V commissioned the architect Domenico Fontana to create new buildings to house the Vatican collections, and these are still used today. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]