Search for: "Sams v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 724
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 4:09 am by Susan Brenner
” And as Wikipedia explains, in the United States jurors are the trier of fact, i.e., they decide what, if any, elements of the charged crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
At Verdict, Vikram David Amar concurs with other commentators who have suggested that Jeffrey Toobin’s behind-the-scenes account of Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
Steve Vladeck’s comments added to this by pointing to a series of recently decided or argued cases on contractor liability, included the lesser noticed United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:17 pm
United States that Commerce lacked the legal authority to impose CVDs on NME imports. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:44 pm by Orin Kerr
Discriminatory failure to investigate and prosecute crimes has been a major problem for victims of sexual assault and violence against women (something the Supreme Court acknowledged, then disregarded, in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:05 pm by J
" She is finishing her book manuscript Banking on the Body, a history of body banking in the United States, drawing upon her doctoral dissertation, Body Banks: A History of Milk Banks, Blood Banks and Sperm Banks in the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by Joshua Matz
United States, “a case that could bring about profound changes in the way courts impose criminal fines, which serve as the principal sanction for organizations, including corporations. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:59 pm by Christopher Danzig
What business does a case like that have in the courts of the United States? [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:34 am by Conor McEvily
The Court’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]