Search for: "Securities Co. v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 4,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
 However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Here is Richard’s article. ****************************** The United States Supreme Court held in Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
In Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Overall, a state’s duties to a refugee reaching a particular territory – whose international relations the state controls – are in principle and in normal circumstances limited to providing and securing the refugee’s Convention rights in that context. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:30 pm by Russell Spivak
Specifically, the brief points to the 2013 Memorandum of Understanding between the United States and Afghanistan; President Obama’s 2014 declarations about ending “combat operations” and bringing the war “to a responsible conclusion”; and the Bilateral Security Agreement signed in September 2014 that governs “the terms of the United States’ military presence in Afghanistan beyond 2014,” which outright bars… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
United States, a case involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there are some distinctions, Lou, a leading constitutional authority on national security law and separation of powers, found a case as early as 1912, Firth Sterling Steel Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Consent To Jurisdiction By Registering to do BusinessIn June of 2023, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court was overturned by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Mallory v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Super. 2010), under which the Superior Court rejected a similar argument because the MSPA was not designed to enable private parties to act on behalf of the United States Government in securing reimbursement to Medicare. [read post]