Search for: "Self v. People" Results 521 - 540 of 7,932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
” Whatever you want to call it, Scalia talks about the right of individual people first. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:22 pm
They also lead people to spend far more on the legal battle and is warranted by the sums actually at stake. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:16 pm by Robin Wilson
  Her rigid winner-takes-all approach is myopic and self-defeating. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
She then returned to Glasgow, fearing she would have to self-isolate in a London hotel room for two weeks. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:57 pm by Andrew Dat
  What can be considered offensive to one group of people may not necessarily be considered hateful to another group, and so forth. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am by Brian Shiffrin
We therefore substitute our own discretion, " even in the absence of an abuse [of discretion],' " and we modify the order by determining that defendant is a level two risk (People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070, 1071, quoting Matter of Von Bulow, 63 NY2d 221, 224; see People v Brewer, 63 AD3d 1604). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm by Unknown
S.2264 - A bill to reauthorize the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Discrimination The principle in Thlimennos v Greece requires unlike cases to be treated differently [40]. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:06 am by David Markus
Interestingly, many people think the mural contains demeaning images that can be viewed as racist but that it should be left up as historical (option 3). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm by Kerry Sheehan and Kit Walsh
EFF, along with the Center for Democracy and Technology, and Public Knowledge, filed an amicus brief in the case of BWP Media v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:17 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
People v Aldapa (1971) 17 CA3d 184, 188, 94 CR 579. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]