Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 521 - 540
of 6,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
Vans, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
The absence of covenants explains the parties’ focus on good will and Justice Borrok’s reliance on the Court of Appeals’ 1981 opinion in Mohawk Maintenance Co. v Kessler holding, on the one hand, that the seller of a company including its good will has an implied duty not to engage in solicitation impairing the company’s good will and, on the other hand, the seller has no general non-compete duty absent express agreement. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v Goldsmith, Brief for Respondents [PDF] — Goldsmith’s counsel this week filed its merits brief in the closely-watched Supreme Court copyright case. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:56 am
QYK Brands LLC d/b/a Glowwy and FTC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Accordingly, the panel affirmed the dismissal by the district court (Einhorn v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 7:42 am
See State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
” Garr v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:22 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Court of Appeals Rules That a Timely Filed Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Can Recover All Damages, No Matter How Long Ago They Occurred First off today, Stephen Carlisle at NOVA Southern University reports that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in the Starz v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:20 am
Frydco Capital Group, LLC v Carlton Fields, P.A. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 10:43 am
Chiusa v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 8:37 am
v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
In the landmark decision SEC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437 [2011]; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P., 186 AD3d 934, 938… [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 1:45 pm
Indemnities Buyers may also wish to negotiate indemnities from sellers against losses related to modern slavery issues. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:37 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:37 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 12:15 am
Tukes v. [read post]
