Search for: "Sells v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 14,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2020, 12:19 pm
General Motors LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:12 am
In this respect the Court continues its unprecedented foray in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:45 am
For the Oregon hypothetical, the solicitor general explains that states never have immunity in the courts of the other states, pointing to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Nevada v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:27 am
Recently, ElderCounsel published a blog regarding case law out of New Jersey regarding how the state Medicaid office imposed a penalty when a home was sold for less than fair market value. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
The case of Sassower v. 975 Stewart Avenue Associates, LLC is fast approaching poster-child status as an illustration of the headaches that can follow from poorly drafted valuation criteria in the buy-sell provision of a shareholders' or operating agreement. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:43 am
"V. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:35 am
In Dickson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:37 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued an important class certification decision, and it is not Dukes v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:14 am
Wittman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:52 pm
The Target pharmacy normally did not sell Norco . . . .The wholesaler (‘supplier’) typically delivered the drug orders to the pharmacy between 12:30 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
Stambovsky v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:02 am
But, decisions outside of the Second Circuit held that selling a trademark as a keyword to trigger advertising does state a cause of action for trademark infringement. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
On January 28, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal district court decision that had struck down most of the regulations on the sales of alcoholic beverages imposed by the State of Washington in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:09 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions;Search and Seizure Body: State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:17 am
BY MARC BOURGEIOSThe second day of Sony v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 7:12 am
Defendants summarily repeat their invalidity and non-infringement arguments and argue that [the defendant] purchased its current inventory in 'good faith,' stating that '[t]he fact that the [C]ourt has found that the PVC cap . . . is an elastic fastener is, at a minimum, heavily debatable.' The Court is unaware of -- and Defendants fail to cite to -- any authority that permits an exception to a preliminary injunction on a showing of 'good faith.'"… [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:52 am
AC33894 - State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:31 am
The first of which is obvious: blue-penciling is (in most states) discretionary and a tough sell on some judges. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
Bailey v. [read post]
