Search for: "Smith v. Kennedy"
Results 521 - 540
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Seibert, in which a four-justice plurality opinion authored by Justice David Souter espoused one rule and Justice Anthony Kennedy, concurring only in the judgment, advocated another. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing in a media law case is outstanding: Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
Although it’s not an IAC case, the SCOTUS also issued Smith v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
His Norfolk host Vaughan Smith told Newsweek “I think it would be foolish to determine WikiLeaks is over. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Garza v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
In the Supreme Court, I’ll take Kennedy (Kennedy v The Charities Commission [2014] UKSC 20) for several reasons. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Brett Wilson’s Media Law Blog has covered the case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB), which concerned the liability of a blogger for comments regarding a planning dispute. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Strawn v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:14 pm
Currier v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
In the Courts On 15 March 2012 partial permission to appeal was given by Dame Janet Smith in the case of Waterson v Lloyds. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Justice Scalia also wrote Smith and favored Chevron. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
In the news Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry granted clemency to Richard Tandy Smith. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Pill and Patten, plus Sir Paul Kennedy) agreed. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:31 am
Padilla v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am
To that extent, as I discuss here, the UK Supreme Court's recent decision in Smith v Secretary of State for Defence, in which it held that UK soldiers do not have rights against the UK under the ECHR when operating outside an area under UK effective control, was in accordance with the principle of universality. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Special Counsel Jack Smith has concluded that he can prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that several private lawyers acted as co-conspirators in former President Donald Trump’s criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Arizona in Dickerson v. [read post]
