Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by John Floyd
Quattlebaum, a South Carolina native, contributed at least $25,000 or more to prominent South Carolina political hacks, like Sen. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am by Robin Shea
Last week I heard David Lopez, General Counsel of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, speak about EEOC litigation developments at the annual North Carolina/South Carolina Labor and Employment Law conference. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm by zshapiro
Furthermore by basing the statute on state law a defendant who committed the same offense but lives across the border in South Carolina may not be facing an ACCA mandatory minimum. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:50 am by Gregory Forman
Both South Carolina and United States Supreme Court case law indicating that one cannot invoke the 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in a civil case as a method of defeating or shifting the burden of proof. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The South Carolina Supreme Court accepted four certified questions from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina: (1) Under South Carolina law, when a plaintiff seeks recovery from a person, other than his employer, for an injury sustained on the job, may the jury hear an explanation of why the employer is not part of the instant action? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:37 pm by Phil Dixon
In this South Carolina case, the plaintiff was an inmate at a prison and accused a guard of sexual assault. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 7:36 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. at 1029-30, necessitate that property owners be protected, via the judicial takings doctrine, against state court decisions that abrogate constitutional rights.More about the case on our resource page. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 6:37 am
South Carolina (1994), some states with LWOP did not inform the jury of this alternative even when so requested by the defense. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The problem stems from an overbroad and poorly monitored federal regulation, upheld by the US Supreme Court in Thornburgh v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Amy Howe
South Carolina Conference of the NAACP, the justices will consider a challenge to the congressional redistricting map that South Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature enacted after the 2020 census. [read post]