Search for: "Sparks v. Sparks" Results 521 - 540 of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2011, 6:50 am by Kiran Bhat
Michael Kirkland of the United Press International connects the outcome of Snyder v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:45 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
PrawfsBlawg reports: A couple weeks ago, Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia, issued a dissent from denial of cert in Plumley v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 5:45 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Circuit last week in Software & Information Industry Association v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:53 am by SCOTUSblog
Supreme Court (Sinead Cruise, Reuters) Supreme Court affirmative action cases spark heated debate over meaning of Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:15 am by Steve Delchin
  See Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:41 pm
This is further supported by the fact that in its last case dealing with § 101, Laboratory Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:30 am by zbrown
With less than two months before Election Day, controversy was sparked between republicans and democrats when President Trump nominated federal appellate judge and Notre Dame law professor Amy Coney Barrett, known as a conservative judge and a former clerk for Justice Scalia, to fill Justice Ginsburg’s seat. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
At the opposite end of the spectrum, however, the California Supreme Court enforced a surrogacy agreement in a 1993 case, Johnson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.April 9, 2013 - 10 AM: Intellect Technical Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am by Ad Law Defense
  James Boswell et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am by Ad Law Defense
  James Boswell et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:50 am by Layla Kuhl
In Biondo v Biondo, the Court of Appeals determined that § 407(a) of the Social Security Act, preempts state law regarding the division of marital assets in a consent divorce judgment. [read post]