Search for: "Spelling v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 2,447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Kathleen Claussen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am by Lyle Denniston
” Since the likelihood today is that the two highest-profile cases testing new laws as forbidden “bills of attainder” both involve President Trump or his Administration in one way or another, it is useful to note that the Supreme Court went the furthest to spell out the meaning of the clause in a famous decision in 1977, Nixon v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
There are many other constitutional doctrines that are not spelled out in the Constitution but are nevertheless implicit in its structure and supported by historical practice—including, for example, judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
 FACTS SHOULD NOT BE CUT & PASTED FROM ONE CASE TO THE NEXT As an initial matter, and leaving aside the numerous errors in spelling and grammar, which betray serious copy-editing failures prior to release, the opinion got the facts wrong as they appear in the record for this case. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by John Jascob
Version 1.0 simply stated that preapproval was required for posts that could contain material information (SEC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
Evans v Fleri (2019) EW Misc 12 (CC) A lesson in drafting from Wales. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
According to Steil and Traficonte, the Court’s Bank of America v. [read post]