Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 521 - 540 of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm by Stephen Page
In this regard counsel referred to Nettler & Nettler [2009] FamCAFC 185at [28], which identified this as the guiding standard in relation to the valuation of land, as articulated in Spencer v Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418.The fact that a business does not sell need not be taken as indicative of the value of shares of a business; the test laid down in Spencer v Commonwealth can only be applied where there is a ready market, and is “of no… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Spencer L. Reames
  The respective objections raised multiple theories for rejection of, and affirmative defenses against, the charity’s claim including (i) forgery of the decedent’s signature, (ii) lack of due execution, (iii) lack of consideration, (iv) lapse upon the decedent’s death, (v) laches and unclean hands, (vi) expiration of the statute of limitations, (vii) fraudulent inducement, and (viii) the decedent’s lack of capacity. [read post]
In addition to other aggravating features, she had written to Mr Justice Spencer saying she felt no remorse for the murders. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Although wordy and filled with dicta, and  the decision warrants a read-through for its review of the Act.In the case of Spencer v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:53 am by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
On Friday, June 13, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark decision (R v Spencer) upsetting common interpretations of a provision of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) that had been relied upon for many years as permitting pre-warrant disclosures of subscriber information by Internet Service Providers and other organizations in response to police requests. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:30 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:47 am by Vishnu Kannan
Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
The review focuses "largely on the controversial decision issued by the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm by Steve Vladeck
Admittedly, that’s where things get a little trickier: In Spencer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:34 am by Andrew Ramonas
Harper, who represented the plaintiffs in the American Indian trust funds lawsuit, Cobell v. [read post]