Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 9:12 am
Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 R. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
Leeds Group v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:57 pm
(Patently-O) (IPBiz) AG Niilo Jääskinen advises ECJ in Interflora keyword reference: Interflora v Marks & Spencer / Niilo Jääskinen???????????????????? [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Other commentary comes from Phillip Pemberton at Ogletree Deakins, Shoba Wadhia and Gabriel Chin at ACSblog, and Spencer Amdur in The New Republic. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:17 am
Rush v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Pumpkin by Flowers by Walter As summer gives way to autumn and the golden leaves tumble, the prettiest flowers are those that come the florists -- which brings the IPKat on to today's decision in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
” “‘The mere identity of a client itself is something that can be privileged,’ said John Browning, a Spencer Fane trial partner. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:36 am
For those who prefer briefs to boxers, a periodic collection of fashionable events in the judicial system: Venus v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
Spencer v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 8:22 am
On November 27, 2008 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") issued its judgment in Ministry of Finance v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
On Friday, June 13, 2014 SCC delivered the R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Spencer. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:12 pm
In Speedemissions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:18 am
Spencer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
Spencer, 422 F. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm
Bowker and Sarah V. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
Business standards and practices - what business standards and practices will prevail following: SSP's Standards of Professional Conduct; Spencer v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 2:35 pm
And, thanks to this post at AL&P, I see that the Virginia Supreme Court last week issued this interesting ruling in Billips v. [read post]
