Search for: "Spencer v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2011, 7:11 pm by royblack
Collins Spencer Catch the Bear, 727 F.2d 759, 761 (8th Cir. 1984); United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am by INFORRM
  This was in the case of Spencer v United Kingdom (1998) 25 EHRR CD 105) which concerned publication in tabloid newspapers of photographs and information about Countess Spencer attending a clinic for the treatment of an eating disorder and for alcoholism. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
Spencer stated: “With such a broad concept in existence, backed with such broad remedies, what need have we of any other criminal offence? [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
Spencer stated: “With such a broad concept in existence, backed with such broad remedies, what need have we of any other criminal offence? [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am by Justin Walsh
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]
24 May 2008, 11:31 pm
X------------------------------------------------------- I know I know plaintiff lawyers... you've read or heard about Macomber v Travelers and/or Spencer v Hartford and been fed the facts and the propaganda- you're thinking "how can I trust these people? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
CPLR 306-b authorizes an extension of time for service in two discrete situations: "upon good cause shown" or "in the interest of justice" (Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 104-106 [2001]). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
United States, involving the federal harmless error rule, and Reichle v. [read post]