Search for: "State v Gant"
Results 521 - 540
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 8:57 am
The state court held that Gant could not have reached his car during the search and posed no safety threat to the officers, making a vehicle search unreasonable under the “reaching-distance rule. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Sotomayor’s dissent in Gant v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently overruled a long established precedent, found in New York v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:07 pm
Perhaps the most important criminal law decision issued so far this year, was that of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v Gant, â€â [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:46 am
Gant). [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
United States (08-5721). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
In a stunning new decision by the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:25 am
As the 9th District explains in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
Got the briefs done, and next week we’ll go back to a full schedule, which will include a look at the Gant decision, the oral argument in the Supreme Court case on strip-searching school students, and the possible ramifications of its decision earlier this year in Oregon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
If last week's Gant opinion -- which substantially rolled back the damage inflicted by New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
Gant.] [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
In the recent decision of Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:32 am
In the recent United States Supreme Court decision, Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 9:32 am
In the recent United States Supreme Court decision, Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:46 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The case is Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
The state court held that Gant could not have reached his car during the search and posed no safety threat to the officers, making a vehicle search unreasonable under the “reaching-distance rule” of New York v. [read post]
