Search for: "State v Hooks" Results 521 - 540 of 1,747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Most of the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, which lets public defendants off the hook in damages claims when the law was not clearly-established at the time of the violation. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Michael M. Oswalt
In addition, given the ascension of right-to-work laws and cases like Janus v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
United States President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, is discontinuing his defamation actions against Fusion GPS and Buzzfeed arising out of the infamous “Steele Dossier” Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has a number of posts including: An analysis of the approval of net neutrality laws in California and considers the practical legislative implications. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:25 pm
On the other hand, the CJEU in Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801 held that an English Court could not apply the doctrine of forum non conveniens to decline jurisdiction over a claim against a European domiciliary on the ground that the natural forum for the claims was outside Europe (albeit the CJEU in that case did not state whether this doctrine applied in cases concerned with the subject matter of Art 24). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm by Adam Levitin
 The CRA states that a rule may not "take effect," until the rule and its proposed effective date have been transmitted to Congress. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
When Congress first started having hearings about child labor and convict made goods, some people suggested that a hook for Congress was unfair competition—producers in other states were at a cost disadvantage to those who were child labor users. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 5:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In that case and in McDonald v City of Chicago, Justice Antonin Scalia struck local ordinances banning handguns.The cases, however, left open the question of what standard should be imposed in reviewing the constitutionality of state hand gun laws. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
This stated that the OFT would consider an absolute prohibition on assignment to be unfair if there was no break clause or other way to end the tenancy early after 3 months. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
This stated that the OFT would consider an absolute prohibition on assignment to be unfair if there was no break clause or other way to end the tenancy early after 3 months. [read post]