Search for: "State v Ore"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 2:31 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Anam v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1140 (19 October 2010) KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft Für Mineraloele mBH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG ( the Mercini Lady) [2010] EWCA Civ 1145 (19 October 2010) Bolsover District Council & Anor v Ashfield Nominees Ltd & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1129 (19 October 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v Markandan… [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
Baroness Hale specifically alerted at [35] to the very real problem of discrimination against gay people before stating that this was not happened in the present case. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
He also stated that the general rule that there is no duty to protect others from third party harm is not appropriate for members of a force whose duty it is to provide protection. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Geo Networks Ltd v The Bridgewater Canal Co Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1348 (30 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) K, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3102 (Admin) (29 November 2010) Michael, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3026 (Admin) (05 November 2010) Kownacki, R (on the application of) v District… [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:41 am
The Director for Public Prosecutions appealed successfully by way of case stated to the High Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Cotton & Ors, R (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWHC 3437 (Admin) This was the Liberty backed judicial review of the bedroom tax regulations on the basis that the regulations amounted to an article 8 breach, or an article 14 breach read with article 8, or that the regulations were irrational. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:15 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:25 am
It stated that “turpitude” involves a breach of the public law of the state and additionally includes certain “quasi-criminal” acts such as dishonesty, certain anomalous acts and infringement of statutory rules enacted for the protection of the public interest. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:23 pm
In State of Oregon v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
The basic scheme for allocation of jurisdiction under the Recast Regulation is that persons domiciled in a Member State of the European Union should generally be sued in that Member State (by article 4), but they may also be sued in another member state in certain situations, including in cases of exclusive jurisdiction specified under article 24. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 (15 April 2008) London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 (15 April 2008) YB (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 360 (15 April 2008) High Court (Family Division) Nottingham City Council v G & Ors [2008] EWHC 540 (Fam) (18 March 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Office of Government Commerce… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Araci v Fallon [2011] EWCA Civ 668 (04 June 2011) RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Riva Bella SA v Tamsen Yachts GmbH [2011] EWHC 1434 (Comm) (06 June 2011) Lehman Brothers Commodity Services Inc v Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank [2011] EWHC 1390 (Comm) (07 June 2011) High Court (Technology and Construction Court)… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:33 am
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 609; [2015] EWCA Civ 1264 These appeals considered whether, in order to successfully bring a claim for indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, a claimant needs to show the reason why a provision, criterion or practice puts or would put (a) the claimant; and (b) persons with whom the claimant shares a protected characteristic, at a particular disadvantage. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:51 am
& Anor> [2007] EWCA Civ 475 (23 May 2007) Secretary of State for the Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs v Bancoult R. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 10:23 pm
Diesel v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:54 am
State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:41 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hutchings-Whelan v Hutchings [2012] EWCA Civ 38 (26 January 2012) D v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 39 (31 January 2012) Annison v Nolan [2012] EWCA Civ 54 (31 January 2012) Revenue and Customs v The GKN Group [2012] EWCA Civ 57 (31 January 2012) Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd & Ors v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 24 (31 January 2012) Barrett v Bem… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:26 am
In regards to the second ground it stated that s 213 of the 1986 Act did have extra-territorial effect and therefore could be invoked against the appellants. [read post]
