Search for: "State v. Armstrong"
Results 521 - 540
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 8:54 pm
Caesar v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong granted the motion. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:06 pm
Dancy v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:45 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong had an excellent explanation of lis pendens: Federal courts look to state law regarding in matters pertaining to lis pendens. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:19 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong stated that the redactions were sufficient to give the court jurisdiction to hear the case. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:59 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong disagreed stating that "federal subject matter jurisdiction is premised on the face of the complaint and cannot lie in anticipated defenses. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
And all of us have forgotten why these United States were constituted. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:22 pm
Adamian v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:45 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong dismissed the case with leave to amend, finding Garter-Bare to be good law citing Hart v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm
This left open a "liberal approach" with respect to similar complaints brought through other paths, such as a state v. state application.Moreover, Ntwari viewed the decision as part of an accumulation of matters against Habré, sometimes called "Africa's Pinochet" on account of the brutality of his reign in Chad. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:08 pm
DL v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
Diehl-Armstrong, 2010 WL 3718941 (W.D. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
Lambeth sought possession against the occupiers, who included Messrs Kay, Constantine, Cole, Greenhalgh, Armstrong, Ballantine, Breschinsky, and Ms Barnett. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am
The suit, Mesa Water, L.P. and G&J Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
(quoting U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Armstrong, Jr. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
" Alas, Walter Brown, Jr. was so lucky, as shown in Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm
In order to find that GPS devices require a search warrant the Court had to distinguish the use of GPS devices from the use of beepers in the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
