Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch) (02 December 2016) is a relatively short (45 paragraph) judgment of Mr Justice Arnold, in his own words 'not without hesitation'. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
At first instance, Arnold J concluded that the claim was referring to the finished product. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
The facts of Arnold v Britton neatly illustrate this. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
” Birss J endorsed Arnold J’s approach in reaching a similar conclusion in HTC v Gemalto [2013] EWHC 1876 (Pat). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Thankfully, GuestKat Eibhlin Vardy will soon be reporting on the Court of Appeal's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy where the Court upheld Mr Justice Arnold's construction (see the first instance report by wonderful Kat friend Amy Crouch here). [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
At first instance, Arnold J followed two first instance English Court decisions which suggest that the transfer of equitable title is sufficient (KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] and HTC v Gemalto [2013]). [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
The Wilson appellate distinguished the effect of Family Code section 3651 from the trial court's equitable jurisdiction to forever stay enforcement of the arrears, citing Jackson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:52 pm
Virginia v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Loewy’s article, United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:09 am
Facts: This case (Hersko v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
Arnold J considered that this was an abuse of process. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:48 pm
Arnold appeared first on Tennessee Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:48 pm
Arnold appeared first on Tennessee Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:48 pm
Arnold appeared first on Tennessee Injury Attorney Blog. [read post]
