Search for: "State v. Austin"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2013, 8:47 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 8:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:10 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 7:30 am
"The Rights of Detained Child Migrants," Arizona State Law Journal, vol. 57 (Forthcoming, 2025) [preprint]Related post:- Thematic Focus: Detention (25 Feb. 2025) [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:24 pm
Supreme Court to invalidate the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy that takes race into account. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Austin, 479 F.3d 363, 367 (5th Cir.2007); United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Legal Fields, Public Spheres, and the Twin Challenges of State and Market. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:56 am
Local media in Austin have highlighted several cases matching this profile.Grits agrees that closed information about deceased suspects is an important aspect of the problem. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:46 am
Bacon, Sally Crawford, Bruce Moseley, Eduardo V. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:54 am
"The state corrective process as a whole was ineffective," Brandt said.The opinion in Balentine v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
The Court of Criminal Appreals ruling in Olsen v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
Fisher v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:57 am
Texas (Austin). [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Following the release of any opinions, the Court will hear argument in Gross v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:32 pm
In today's Austin v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
