Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 521 - 540
of 701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
This recommendation is not legally binding on Member States. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
According to a recent report issued by Austria’s Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Counterterrorism, Iranian intelligence services—including the IRGC’s intelligence organization and its Quds Force—have spread in the country. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:58 pm
In fact little or no justification is offered by the Commission for this conclusion.Kerkhoven again arose for consideration, however, within the context of X, Y & Z v United Kingdom (1997). [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:53 am
Belgium and Belcacemi and Oussar v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm
Austria The Austrian DPA has issued an 18 million euro fine against Osterreichische Post AG for GDPR violations. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:57 am
This could ultimately cost the UK a lot of money in compensation payments, although it is of note that the court has did not award compensation in Hirst or the more recent case of Frodl v Austria, The coalition government will be wary of the European Court of Human Rights’ recently acquired new powers to punish intransigent states. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 11:02 pm
The consultation document notes that in Belgium those prisoners who receive a sentence of longer than 4 months are disqualified from voting; in Austria prisoners who are sentenced for a year or more are disqualified; in Italy prisoners serving 5 years or more are disqualified and in Greece all prisoners who are given a life sentence are permanently disenfranchised.33 The Government acknowledges that setting the threshold at which prisoners become disenfranchised may lead to inconsistencies… [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:06 pm
I'll link agenda and speaker info when all that becomes available.Civil Society and Outer Space Forum 2007, Oct. 8-9, 2007, Vienna, Austria, organized by the Conference of Non-governmental Organizations in Consultative Relationship with the United Nations (CONGO). [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:50 am
Dean Spielmann, Judge of the European Court of Human Rights and President of Section V of the Court will deliver the keynote address on 8 June 2012. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
In their letter to the Council, the campaigners point out that planning authorities, as emanations of the state, have an obligation under the Human Rights Act to consider the effects of their decisions of affected third parties. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Two points are worth making here; both are demonstrative of problems which beset the current state of the law. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:46 pm
That conclusion follows directly, the plaintiffs say, from the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Republic of Austria v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm
Herring Networks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm
The day before the FTC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Austria It is reported that the Austrian public broadcaster, ORF has issued libel proceedings against the Deputy Head of the Government, Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache after he accused it and a news presenter of lying. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
Is that governed by Member State law? [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
The voting was as follows: In favour: Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Morocco, Namibia, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam Against: Austria, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Montenegro, Republic of Korea, Romania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom of Great Britain and… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
