Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 521 - 540
of 701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm
Most importantly, it must be questioned, whether the new Regulations contain overriding specifications regarding the classification of the liability of the falsus procurator that are binding for the Member States. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Austria (App. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:15 am
Austria-The Reich Governor has jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
[Austria] [Comity] Broda v Abarca, 2011 WL 900983 (D.Colo.) [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Cautious Co v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:58 am
145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf AUGSTEIN GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 am
’ In contrast to the Irish courts, Lady Hale emphasised the intrinsic importance of citizenship, including the value of ‘growing up and being educated’ in one’s own country, and pointed to the increasing emphasis on the child’s best interests in the Strasbourg case law, including in Uner v Netherlands (2006), Maslov v Austria (2007), and da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands (2006). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Their data was stored on webservers in Germany and Austria but could be accessed via links from elsewhere, including the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
The Convention also forbade States parties from conferring such immunities from (severe) criticism on their own (republican) heads of State (Artun and Güvener v Turkey, para 31; Pakdemirli v Turkey, paras 52 et seq). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:24 am
Budvar opposed, citing the following alleged prior rights: (i) a figurative Bud mark effective for ‘all types of light and dark beer’, in Austria, Benelux and Italy; (ii) the appellation of origin ‘Bud’, registered under the Lisbon Agreement in respect of beer, and effective in France, Italy and Portugal; (iii) an Austrian appellation of origin ‘Bud’ protected in Austria under a bilateral convention with the former state of… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
In his post on Zehentner v Austria he pointed out that, just as American hitmen consider that European fast food chains do certain things rather differently, so the appellate courts in England and Wales had viewed the approach of the European Court of Human Rights with bemusement. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
In his post on Zehentner v Austria he pointed out that, just as American hitmen consider that European fast food chains do certain things rather differently, so the appellate courts in England and Wales had viewed the approach of the European Court of Human Rights with bemusement. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In that respect, as was explained in a previous post, the in the recent case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights decided that at this point in time, Article 12 does not require States to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:20 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm
Reichel stated that he owned the Painting and four other Kokoschka works. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:09 pm
V. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm
The civil lawsuit, Beaty, et al. v. [read post]
