Search for: "State v. Becker" Results 521 - 540 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2008, 3:11 am
Washburn student intern David Becker and I won in State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
David Becker     Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 08a0740n.06  USA v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:16 pm
For publication opinions today (2): In Gary Becker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
District Judge, Nebraska, who cited a legal blog in his opinion in United States v. [read post]