Search for: "State v. Boyd" Results 521 - 540 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Along with it, he filed a petition for review (Muhammad v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am by INFORRM
  In Northern Ireland, property developer Frank Boyd accepted £30,000 in libel damages from the Sunday World newspaper. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
John-Paul Boyd recommended a separate code of conduct that supports a more conciliatory approach than what the Model Code conceptualizes (here and here.) [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Shoemaker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Sanctuary Law and a Strong Anglo-Saxon State? [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
Boyd Sickles, 43, of Urbana, was driving east on.thegazette.com/... [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The News Media Association has said there are “grounds for judicial review” of the decision to recognise Impress as a state-approved press regulator. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
To many it seems obvious that political liberal commitments to equality, fairness, and state ethical neutrality demand reforms to marriage far more radical than its extension to same-sex couples. [read post]