Search for: "State v. Burns" Results 521 - 540 of 3,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2012, 10:47 am by M. Umberger
Although this country barely bats an eye at the treasonous Gunpowder Plot, England treats the day as an unofficial holiday, replete with fireworks, revelry, and burning effigies of Mr. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 5:50 am by Famighetti & Weinick
The United States Supreme Court’s ruling on June 4, 2018, in Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In Munim Abdul and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 247 (Admin) the High Court ruled that prosecution of a group of people who had shouted slogans, including, “burn in hell”, “baby killers” and “rapists” at a parade of British soldiers, was not a breach of their right to freedom of expression, protected by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
  Citing extensively to Brae Burn, Inc v Bloomfield Hills, 350 Mich 425, 430-431; 86 NW2d 166 (1957), the Court held that an ordinance is not invalid just because it bars the most profitable land use. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Gordon Burns, Deputy State Solicitor General, James M. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Gen Sawyer
Coast GuardEnvironmental Protection AgencyWashington state Department of EcologyWhat’s going on in the area? [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Gen Sawyer
Coast GuardEnvironmental Protection AgencyWashington state Department of EcologyWhat’s going on in the area? [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by Mary L. Dudziak
  Legal history-related panels include:ThursdayConfiguring the Cold War: Constructive Courtroom Narratives in Dennis et al v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:08 am by Timothy Cornell
  For starters, the Supreme Court said in the famous SEC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]