Search for: "State v. Butt"
Results 521 - 540
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2010, 7:59 am
Cornelius v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:49 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Charlie Crist’s controversial Big Sugar land buy – or serve as a judicial kick in the butt to finally seal the much-delayed, twice-downsized deal. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB Panel… [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:33 pm
In fact, they got to go to the big show—as a defendant at the United States Supreme Court (Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:35 am
Two weeks ago the 8th District decided in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Two weeks ago the 8th District decided in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer) US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
v=_RHha6fYzhY http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
More on Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:18 am
The case resembles Parks v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
Two Pesos v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
Watson, Winkelmann’s legal counsel, stated “the sense of parody employed by Winkelmann within the context of his South Butt undertakings clearly demonstrate a respectful, if not faltering ‘anti-North Face’ posture designed in all respects to distinguish itself from any and all North Face products. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
LEXIS 17443 (ND IL, Feb. 26, 2010), an Illinois federal district court dismissed on mootness and sovereign immunity grounds claims by Muslims confined in a state mental health facility that the facility did not offer Friday Jumu'ah services.In Butts v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
We should butt out and leave it to the experts. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:30 am
In the original decision, United States v. [read post]