Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 521 - 540
of 9,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
In the Cogeco Cable Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm
In Tyler v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm
In Tyler v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
On Friday, I blogged about the case of Cervantes v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 10:27 pm
In Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:16 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:45 am
Facts of S.H. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:35 am
In the case of Klaine v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:35 am
In the case of Klaine v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:25 pm
In today’s case (Deiter v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:22 am
Then the panel asked for further briefing in lieu of Reed v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 6:38 pm
Here, it found that the state court proceeding did not include the doctor’s federal claim of forced labor. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:32 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California today granted NCLA’s motion for preliminary injunction in Høeg, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 pm
Massachusetts (a laboratory report stating an unknown substance was cocaine was testimonial evidence), and Bullcoming v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am
The Court did flatly reject the notion that a state can regulate what doctors say and write just by slapping the label "professional conduct" on it. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:23 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:36 am
I have a new post up at the Reason Foundation blog about antitrust state-action immunity, in the context of the Fifth Circuit’s Teladoc v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The Attorney General of New Hampshire argues that the correct procedural rule is the rule of United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 7:50 pm
Kadri v. [read post]
