Search for: "State v. Fair" Results 521 - 540 of 30,303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In terms of the spirit of the CUSMA, the USTR argues that Canada’s procedure is neither “fair” nor “equitable” as per Article 3.A.2.4(b) and Article 3.A.2.11(e). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:17 am
   While there is no absolute certainty with fair dealing (or fair use for that matter), the state of Canadian law provides so much flexibility that it is very unlikely that a publisher or web site owner would sue an educational institution for most reasonable uses. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:30 am by Simon Lester
There is some case law, such as Mondev v United States, to support the theory that the standard may be an evolving one. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:22 pm by Gordon
In the case of Service Employees International Union Local No. 150 v. [read post]