Search for: "State v. Family Child Care"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
It held, inter alia, that in the context of a family offense petition, the fact that some of the alleged conduct occurred years earlier is not dispositive, as “the issue is the imminence of the danger and not the age of the threat” (Matter of Pamela N. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
See the ERDC website for FAQs about the service cuts.3)Backgound Brief on Child Care from the Oregon State Legislature's Committee Services Office. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
See the ERDC website for FAQs about the service cuts.3)Backgound Brief on Child Care from the Oregon State Legislature's Committee Services Office. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
In Kraynak v. [read post]
Ischiu v Garcia, 2017 WL 3500403 (D. Maryland, 2017)[Guatemala][Grave Risk of Harm][Petition denied]
15 Sep 2017, 9:21 am
In Ischiu v Garcia, 2017 WL 3500403 (D. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The cornerstone of the Claimants’ case was the decision of the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health & Another, in which it ruled that the procedure under the Care Standards Act 2000 of allowing the provision listing of care workers onto a similar ‘barred from work’ list as to the present case without their being able to make representations ran contrary to article 6 and article 8 rights. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 6:03 am
In Kovacic v Harris, 2018 WL 3105772 (D. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
In V.L. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 6:30 pm
’”....The child placing agencies are, in many ways, the gateway for a family seeking to adopt or foster a child into Michigan’s adoption and foster care system. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:49 am
Although the family urged that the court find a general duty of care for landowners to the public for off-premises injuries, the court held that creating such a duty would be contrary to state law, which does not use the foreseeability of an injury to determine duty (Quiroz v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 2:16 am
In Ibrahim v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
” Indeed, Erazo testified that she and Ortiz had discussed and eventually decided to come to the United States as a family. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:07 am
Grange Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:04 am
A resource family parent is any person with whom a child in the care, custody or guardianship of the division is placed for care. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:13 pm
A & S v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
” Lozano v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:12 am
In Ford v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 10:58 am
It is a fundamental principle in New York Family law that for a request to modify a custody order to be able to proceed in court, be it Supreme Court or Family court, there needs to be a substantial change of circumstances. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(quoting Mozes v. [read post]
