Search for: "State v. Franks" Results 521 - 540 of 4,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 6:32 pm by BuckleySandler
In response to the panel, the CFPB states that it incorporated small business concerns, such as an exemption from new periodic statement requirements for certain small servicers. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:48 am
Employee claims coercion in his agreeing to a demotion in lieu of disciplinary action Pagano v Port Authority, 270 AD2d 206 The Employment Relations Panel of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey affirmed Authority Police Sergeant Frank Pagano agreement to accept a demotion to patrol officer. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm by Keith R. Fisher
  Adjudication has been recognized as a legitimate alternative to rulemaking.since the dawn of the administrative state and the Supreme Court’s landmark 1947 decision in SEC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:51 am by HRWatchdog
This election cycle was the longest election in the country’s history, but California’s state election also is noteworthy in a number of ways, Shaw tells Frank. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion Monday in Doe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:04 pm by James Hamilton
Dodd-Frank’s creation of an entirely new liquidation regime with a far more “bare bones” statute than the Bankruptcy Code and a much less transparent process has created huge uncertainty in the markets, in the view of the hedge fund industry. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:08 am
The State was represented by Frank Ponticello of the Clark County District Attorney's Office. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:16 pm
Determining when the statute of limitations to file a timely Article 78 begins to runRodriguez v Yonkers, App. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Preferred Prescription, Inc. v Health Mgt., 252 AD2d 414,416 [1st Dept 1998]). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
A win for class action objector Ted Frank as Seventh Circuit allows him to challenge what he described as “objector blackmail” payments to other intervenors [Amanda Bronstad, National Law Journal, Pearson v. [read post]