Search for: "State v. Furnish" Results 521 - 540 of 2,595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm by Robert Liles
CMS states in the new Final Rule that it will publish further rulemaking to expand this reporting requirement after assessing the progress of its initial phased-in approach. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
When issued to you or your medical practice, this investigative tool can be used to require that the subject (recipient individual or entity) of a Civil Investigative Demand: Produce such documentary material for inspection and copying, Answer in writing written interrogatories with respect to such documentary material or information, Give oral testimony concerning such documentary material or information,[7] or Furnish any combination of such material, answers, or testimony. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
The details of the complaint remain vague, but Schiff stated that it was filed by an individual in the intelligence community and determined by Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson to be credible and a matter of “urgent concern. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:28 am by James Segroves
And following the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Azar v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm by Robert Liles
This effectively opened the door for patients to readily participate in genetic testing without the fear of losing their insurance due to the presence of a preexisting illness or disease.[5] V. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
A(b) Prior to sending ... any child ... into a receiving state for placement in foster care or as a preliminary to a possible adoption, the sending agency shall furnish the appropriate public authorities in the receiving state written notice ...@ (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 9:35 am by Eric Goldman
HSI * Furniture Retailer Enjoined from Sending eBay VeRO Notices–Design Furnishings v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:30 am by James W. Ward
The Ninth Circuit relied on a California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) opinion letter, which states that employers could specify “basic wardrobe items which are usual and generally usable in the occupation, such as white shirts, dark pants and black shoes and belts, all of unspecified design,” without being required to furnish these items. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Dismissing their appeal, the Court of Appeals first affirmed the principle that "... the employment of a probationary employee may be terminated at the end of the probationary term without a hearing and without specific reasons being stated. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 12:13 pm by Jason Guyser
On June 4, 2019, the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District issued an unpublished opinion in Krista Townley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by skelly
”[5] By contrast, some states will not require the diligent search as to RPG members residing in the state. [read post]