Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 521 - 540
of 8,212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2022, 9:22 pm
However, the ECJ in Phoenix v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm
But TPS holders fought back and won relief from the courts in 2018 in Ramos v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
On page 3, that one specifically points to the Mannheim Regional Court's Nokia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
1547: The Advocate General continues by stating that as part of that structure, only specified office holders can refer (see s33(1)). [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 8:13 pm
Other patent holders than Nokia will be watching those developments with concern.After those first four German injunctions, the Dusseldorf Regional Court stayed two Nokia v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
In 2012, Attorney General Holder issued a statement (Holder Memo) outlining the DOJ’s policy on coordinating parallel civil and criminal proceedings to enforce against fraud. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:11 pm
After the Epic Games v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
In Lucent v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:09 am
The justices were hearing Merrill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:59 am
Antonyuk v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am
Copyright holders have long ignored these potential infringements for a range of economic and public relations reasons. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Holder, 565 U.S. 302, 327–28 (2012). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm
United States, and the retired justice remains stone-faced with each one. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Holder in 2013. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
The court, reversing the injunction and ruling against the trademark holder, found that the RISE label was a weak trademark because it strongly suggested the qualities of the product it labeled and there was extensive third-party usage of the same or similar marks (RiseandShine Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Since our client resided in Havertown, PA, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:15 am
The understanding of aggression, the collective act underlying the crime, has remained virtually unchanged in GA Resolution 3314 and Article 8bis(2) of the ICC Statute since it was first introduced by a Soviet diplomat in 1933 and was found to reflect customary law by the International Court of Justice (Nicaragua v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
Goold argues that such a rule is superior to strict liability because it creates incentives for both the IP holder and the user to avoid infringement [p. 72]. [read post]
