Search for: "State v. Hughes" Results 521 - 540 of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 7:42 pm
Reagan went on to win the New Hampshire primary, the Republican nomination and 44 states in the fall wipe-out of... [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Berger, Poetry, Mercy, and the Phenomenology of Justice, (Forthcoming in Ehud Ben Zvi, Claudia V. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:15 am
Norris catching up on IPKat after some hard partyingphoto credit: https://www.learningliftoff.comPatentWhen Shakespeare wrote "something is rotten in the state of Denmark," he might have very well been describing the Danish court system in 2019. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:23 am
Developments in the FieldSalil Tripathi, Companies, COVID-19 and Respect for Human RightsLise Smit, Claire Bright, Irene Pietropaoli, Julianne Hughes-Jennett & Peter Hood, Business Views on Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Two Recent StudiesJelena Aparac, Business and Armed Non-State Groups: Challenging the Landscape of Corporate (Un)accountability in Armed ConflictsGabriela Quijano, Lithium Might Hold the Key to our Clean Energy… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:00 am by Karen Tani
Hugh’s College, University of Oxford; Global Professor of Law, NYU School of Law "Equity, banking, and the seeds of crisis: Foley v Hill (1838-48)"  October 11 Brittany Farr, Assistant Professor of Law, NYU School of Law "The Other Walker-Thomas: Reading Race in Contracts"  October 25 Shaun Ossei-Owusu, Presidential Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School "Social Engineers on a Grand Scale? [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
”  As an example of government erosion of privacy, the board cites United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law and an editor of Inforrm     [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Charles Swift, counsel to Salim Hamdan, the enemy combatant whose legal case, Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am by CMS
Clarke LJ gave three key reasons in support of his conclusion: The structure of the Policy expressly stated that the insured perils were subject always to the exclusions. [read post]