Search for: "State v. Jeffs" Results 521 - 540 of 2,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 4:30 am by Debra Vey Voda-Hamilton
As the February 18th, 2012 NY Times article states, “Empowerment is a major theme in Ms. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
” In an op-ed at Constitution Daily, Doug Kendall and Brianne Gorod analyze the Sixth Circuit’s recent opinion upholding bans on same-sex marriage (and the recognition of those marriages) in four states; they argue that, although there “are a lot of problems with Judge Sutton’s opinion, . . . one in particular makes clear why his decision can’t stand when the Supreme Court ultimately rules on marriage equality: If Jeff Sutton is right,Loving… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm by Matt Sundquist
CNN's Bill Mears reports that the case could affect state laws in the twenty-two states that have laws similar to the federal restrictions overruled today. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Javier Dominguez
By Jeff Overly, Law360 (June 30, 2023, 1:02 PM EDT) — The U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:23 pm
By Jeff Pietsch Last week, a United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri denied a motion by Intel to dismiss a declaratory judgment suit brought by Express Scripts Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 5:39 am
., Jan. 10th, Jeff Parrott of the South Bend Tribune reports today on yesterday's oral argument before the Supreme Court in the case of Cooper Industries, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm by Matt Brown
What would they do if I incorrectly cited Anders v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 10:16 am
■ First up, a tale of wasteful spending courtesy of co-blogger Bob V. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Garrett Hinck
 Jeff Flake’s speech on Tuesday afternoon. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am by SHG
Two cases whose names may well be connected to one of the most important rulings the Supreme Court will make in our lifetime are United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Randy Barnett
”But the Constitution includes the amendment process of Article V, which has already been used to alter the scheme by allowing an income tax and eliminating the power of state legislatures to select U.S. senators.Add to this, judicial construction of the Constitution vastly expanding federal power in just the past 60 years. [read post]