Search for: "State v. Land" Results 521 - 540 of 13,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 12:15 pm by Ilya Somin
Jeff Benedict is a prominent reporter and author of Little Pink House, an excellent journalistic account of the events leading up to Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 7:26 am
Mose Buchele has written a series of articles, also aired on KUT, about the pipeline industry's failed efforts to make it easier for pipelines to exercise the power of eminent domain after the Texas Supreme Court's decision in Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:47 am by Patricia Salkin
County of Charlseton v South Carolina Dept. of Transportation, 2017 WL 2960751 (SC App. 7/21/2017)Filed under: Preemption, Uncategorized [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:37 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Jewell and Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians (Land into Trust)United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:39 am
 The Kawaiisu claim that they own this land notwithstanding a plethora of treaties with Mexico as well as various other tribes.The district court dismissed the lawsuit for failure to state a claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:Both the majority and concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm by National Indian Law Library
Dep't of Interior (Bureau of Land Management mining project)El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:16 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States applies on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981), to forfeit automobiles owned by non Native Americans for violation of tribal drug laws while on tribal land? [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:57 pm
  The issue in that case is whether the state or littoral landowners are entitled to ownership of accreted land. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 2017-10-05 Herrera Cert Petition Question presented: Whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States,” thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:42 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit determined in Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. [read post]