Search for: "State v. Little Bear" Results 521 - 540 of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
 Be patient, though: it will take them a little while to read them all! [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Both Jenkins and Fieldcrest are asexual and aromantic (“ace” and “aro,” or “aroace”), i.e., they experience little to no sexual attraction and little to no romantic attraction. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Given this taxonomy of interpretive styles, how would we characterize Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
He says it states quite clearly at the top in big letters “Business Equipment Maintenance Agreement”, and that there is no way it can be mistaken for an invoice. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:53 pm by Calvin Massey
  The Court did emphasize the text of the federal law in Whiting and dismissed the scant legislative history bearing on the exemption to the express preemption provision as of little significance. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
This leftover accommodation of the last century’s photocopying practices, however, has little bearing on applying data and text mining strategies to commercially operated research databases. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2… [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
 The location of plaintiff’s injury was “‘fortuitous’ because the place of injury bears little relation to [defendant’s] alleged punitive conduct,” given that it “is headquartered in New Jersey,” that the drug (Zometa) “was widely distributed throughout the United States,” and “nothing in NPC’s sales, marketing, or distribution practices suggests that the alleged injury was more likely to occur in… [read post]