Search for: "State v. M. R." Results 521 - 540 of 10,965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
    The Judge handed down a judgment dealing with access to documents and anonymity (R  (On the Application Of the Duke of Sussex) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 682 (Admin)). [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:55 pm by Russell Knight
R. 201(m) Discovery is the request for and turn-over of relevant items from the other party or a third party for the purpose of later presenting one’s divorce case. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Xu was indicted for committing the crime of subverting state power on 5 August 2021. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
RUSSIAN FEDERATION)___________ALLÉGATIONS DE GÉNOCIDE AU TITRE DE LA CONVENTION POURLA PRÉVENTION ET LA RÉPRESSION DU CRIME DE GÉNOCIDE(UKRAINE c. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Whatever the level of their compliance, they have the right not to be subject to an unconstitutional law: see R. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]