Search for: "State v. Mains" Results 521 - 540 of 11,648
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am by Richard Hunt
 The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am by jonathanturley
We recently discussed a troubling decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:49 pm by Reference Staff
Virginia Museum of Fine ArtsLaw Library of Congress’ Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:06 am by SHG
” Funk also did some fight choreography for “Rocky V. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
The following articles in the zero draft, released in June, are the focus of our main concerns about Chapter V,  which deals with cross border surveillance and the extent to which Member States must assist each other and collaborate in surveillance on each other's behalf. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am by Ioannis Kouvakas
Secretary of State before implementing any technical changes. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am by Maksym Vishchyk
Contemporary IHL and practice recognize two main exceptions to combatant’s privilege. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:28 am by Marcia Coyle
The Center reports that the Maine Supreme Judicial Court will hear arguments this fall in Parker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Resolving the conflict Mostyn J had taken the view in EBK v DLO (above) at [101] that “if a defendant in proceedings governed by FPR Part 37 or COPR Part 21 is found to have committed a contempt then that defendant must be named in open court and in general terms the court must state what is the nature of the contempt of court and what punishment, if any, has been imposed. [read post]