Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 521 - 540
of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, in Sky v SkyKick, the judge held that the EU Trade Mark Regulations (1994, 2009 and 2017) did not explicitly state that a lack of clarity and precision was a ground for invalidity of a registered trade mark, and the CJEU would have to provide guidance. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The CJEU’s ruling in DHL v ChronopostThe CJEU made it manifestly clear in its 2011 ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost [see previous Katpost here] that a Europe-wide injunction should only be granted in order to ensure that the proprietor can protect his trade mark, prohibiting only uses which affect or are liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:01 am
Case C 445/12 P Rivella International AG v OHIM, Baskaya di Baskays Alim E.C. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:24 am
After the decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
Dial-A-Mattress I, 57 USPQ2d at 1812 (citing Van Dyne-Crotty, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Deanna Stull Sandra Brinkman and Mark Brinkman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 2:46 pm
’” [Id., at p. 9 (quoting Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Marks DA 17-0686 2019 MT 76N Criminal – Other McGree v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 4:00 am
Yesterday the White House marked National Day of Prayer with a ceremony in the Rose Garden of the White House. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:57 pm
Buccellati v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
Iancu v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
It urged that restriction under Section 18 is permitted only when the description of the mark in the registration is "ambiguous or overly broad," citing Wellcome Foundation Ltd. v. [read post]
