Search for: "State v. McDonnell "
Results 521 - 540
of 634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 4:54 pm
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:21 pm
See McDonnell, 136 S. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Two points are worth making here; both are demonstrative of problems which beset the current state of the law. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[v] More than 50 years later, the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:33 pm
Because there was direct evidence of discrimination, the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting framework was unnecessary. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:37 pm
Brett McDonnell: ... let me briefly lament the D.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
” O. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
” When it comes to the Mar-a-Lago investigation, the order establishes that Smith will oversee “the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States' Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, Donald J Trump v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
This post summarizes decisions published during August 2019 by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that are of interest to state practitioners [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McDonnell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:56 pm
For more, read my More Words Mean Less -- Ava Acupuncture v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 18, 2008)(Unpublished)Affirming dismissal of termination claim under state lawDC CircuitMontgomery v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:32 am
From Watson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See also United Mexican States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Thus, courts in recent years have simply taken the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Southwest Airlines, No. 08-873Propriety of the continued application of burden shifting under McDonnell-Douglass and its progeny for FMLA and ADA cases in general, and FMLA entitlement/interference cases and ADA reasonable accommodation cases in particular (Public Citizen)o o SCOTUS docket hereOakley v. [read post]
Employer could not rely on incomplete info to assert honest belief employee was uncooperative in IME
3 Dec 2013, 8:21 am
The employee’s religious discrimination and harassment claims failed, however (Bloomfield v Whirlpool Corp, November 27, 2013, Helmick, J). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
