Search for: "State v. Park"
Results 521 - 540
of 11,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:55 pm
McGlynn of the Southern District of Illinois, in Barnett v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 2:39 pm
The Court of Appeals dissolves the injunction.The case is Sampson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm
The lawsuit is here: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:43 pm
Planned giving’s role in the orchestra’s financial stability The New York Philharmonic, one of the oldest and most revered orchestras in the United States, relies heavily on planned giving to maintain its financial stability and support its artistic and educational programs. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:46 pm
Found. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
CAMERA LOGS AND SWORN TECHNICIAN’S CERTIFICATE ARE ALL THAT'S REQUIREDAfter he was found liable by the New York City Parking Violations Bureau for speeding in a school-speed zone, "V.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
But if you've got a $45 million aircraft parked in California, you've got to pay taxes on it.So on December 28, 2016, Mr. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:27 am
Parks Service official. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Last week in the courts On 4 April 2023, judgement on costs was handed down by Justice Murray in the case of Parkes v Hall and Earnshaw [2023] EWHC 794 (KB). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
In 2011, the state Supreme Court of Washington ruled in State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
On Wednesday 19th and Thursday 20th April the Court will hear the case of Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and others, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 651. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
Blake v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “The occupier of a park owes a duty to its visitors to take reasonable care to provide reasonably safe premises – safe in the sense of danger of personal injury or damage to property. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
Supreme Court faulted plaintiff for waiting until 2020 to commence this action to recover monies owed as a result of a legal representation that ended in 2015 but, as prejudgment interest only compensates the judgment creditor for the loss of use of money he or she was owed and is not a penalty, the “responsibility for the delay [in bringing suit] should not be the controlling factor in deciding whether interest is to be computed” (Love v State of New York, 78 NY2d 540,… [read post]
