Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 521 - 540
of 76,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2011, 9:21 am
§ 1512(a)(1)(C), makes it a crime “to kill another person, with intent to. . . prevent the communication by any person to a [Federal] law enforcement officer” of “information relating to the . . . possible commission of a Federal offense. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
In Root v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
The case before the court was Harry Henderson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:11 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Possession of a firearm Appellant, Kevin Smith, was charged by the State with being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Last year, in State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:55 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Search of person Sharniel Baker, appellant, was arrested and charged with various drug-related offenses after the police found cocaine on his person. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 12:00 am
Johnston (J.D. 2009, Washburn) has published Comment, The Federal Tax Personality of Disregarded LLCs (Littriello v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:42 am
Callaghan, September 22, 2016, Court of Appeal -Fourth Appellate District – State of California More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:05 pm
"A defendant charged with felony DUI may move to dismiss the charge by alleging that the state is improperly relying on a prior uncounseled misdemeanor DUI conviction," the Court ruled, citing the state Supreme Court's 2008 decision in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:53 am
Indeed, to quote Mr Justice Leggatt, (at the time) of the High Court, in Al-Saadoon and ors v Secretary of State for Defence, [22] on the targeted use of force as an assertion of ‘control’, and thereby ‘jurisdiction’ for the purposes of the ECHR: ‘I find it impossible to say that shooting someone dead does not involve the exercise of physical power and control over that person. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 9:24 am
CUS Nashville Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:18 am
The 2nd DCA recently heard the case of Jose Ferrer v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
(i) Does the broad definition of an employed person in Dodl apply for the purposes of Articles 19 to 22 of the Regulation, where the person has ceased all occupational activity before moving to another member state, notwithstanding the distinction drawn in Chapter 1 of Title III between, on Page 11 the one hand, employed and self-employed persons and, on the other hand, unemployed persons? [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:46 am
Regina v Evans (Gemma) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “For the purposes of gross negligence manslaughter, when a person had created or contributed to the creation of a state of affairs which he knew, or ought to have known had become life-threatening to another person, a consequent duty would normally arise on him to act by taking [...] [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:21 am
" Sandisk Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 3:02 am
Graham v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:05 am
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 870, 875-876 (1989) and Peretz v. [read post]
