Search for: "State v. Potter" Results 521 - 540 of 656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am by Adam Chandler
  In April 2009, the Court issued a five-to-four opinion in FCC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
I asked a judge in Beijing (my wife assisting as interpreter) his views of the judiciary’s state of independence. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:59 pm by Jeff Gamso
  And maybe he is.But it was John Roberts, no fan of my clients, who wrote this a couple of years ago in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm by lawmrh
.‘  But in practice, the ‘shock the conscience‘ test seems too ethereal, too ambiguous, as helpful as Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity, “But I know it when I see it.” [1] Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
The debate, which was initially a state-by-state affair, was refocused when ALI decided to write a new restatement of products liability law in 1991. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
While the amendment was aimed primarily at stamping out discrimination against black Americans, it also extends more broadly to what Justice Potter Stewart called “preference based on lineage. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” That leaves any potential censorship based on the ridiculous standard which Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart advanced for pornography in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM)   United States   US General  Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]