Search for: "State v. Powell"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 8:57 am
This case arises from the defendants' public comments about Smartmatic and their claims that this company's software caused former President Trump to lose the 2020 election.The case is Smartmatic USA v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
The case is State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:34 pm
Powell, 428 U. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
As Justice Lewis Powell observed in a 1977 concurring opinion in Abood v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
" Powell, 541 F.3d at 1314; cf. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 3:39 am
US v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, 783 (1995) (first quoting Powell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
In Oregon v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 5:36 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
The district court held that although the state court had not complied with either state law or the requirements imposed by the Court's 1986 decision in Ford v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
(It's the fun part of Marbury v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:11 am
Sila Luis v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:33 am
In any event, Lewis Powell may be the most important justice of the last half-century, not because of his "constitutional decisions," which are all over the place--see, e.g., Rodriguez, McCleskey v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am
That left the ninth justice, Justice Lewis Powell, to decide the outcome. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Jogee corrected the historic mistake in Chan Wing-Siu [1984] UKPC 27 and R v Powell/English [1997] UKHL 57 of equating foresight with intent to assist in cases of alleged secondary participation. [read post]
