Search for: "State v. Ricks" Results 521 - 540 of 1,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2012, 11:27 am by Rick
For purposes of this discussion, let’s actually assume the State got it one-hundred-percent right. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:11 pm by Steve Hall
  One year later the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Kathy Darvil
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:57 pm by Mark Tushnet
It's in this sense that Rick Hills's suggestion that Masterpiece Cakeshop might represent "the fraying of Smith" makes some sense -- except for the possibility that state anti discrimination commissions might say, "No, our state's law is truly general, and does not allow us to make discretionary exceptions. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
  Well, here’s the thing: Both Mitt Romney and Rick Perry, when governors, had reasonably humane immigration policies (to the extent that states can have immigration policies), but each has tried to run away from his record in the GOP primary race. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  From lawprof Rick Hasen's Election Law Blog, the latest brief in a case we've been following, Carrigan v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Today, the Wall Street Journal has this editorial on the bill that amends the law at issue in the Davenport v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 10:32 am by Rosa Schechter
The Florida Legislature was very busy this month, getting legislation passed and over to Governor Rick Scott's desk before the end of the 2012 Legislative Session this month. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
Visitors to the domain arwew now confronted by a notice which states that the FBI has taken control of the site 'pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States District Court'. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm by Rick Hasen
   Perhaps most relevant is this in-chambers opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Lux v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm by Amy Howe
” They told the justices that there “is no reason to treat this case differently from” Gill v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Rick Maese reports that “[t]he four major U.S. sports leagues have been bracing for” the possibility that the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Shapiro v. [read post]