Search for: "State v. S. C. D." Results 521 - 540 of 13,974
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by David Lynn
One day later, at the request of the Clerk of this court, the SEC filed a letter stating that “the Commission was not able to ‘correct the defects in the rule’ within 30 days of the [c]ourt’s opinion. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 On November 22, 2023, the Departments used their statutory authority (Internal Revenue Code Section 9816(c)(9), ERISA Section 716(c)(9), and PHS Act Section 2799A-1(c)(9)) to grant extensions in the following circumstances: Disputing parties may request additional time, beyond the current business day deadline, to respond to the certified IDR entity’s requests for additional information. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In 2017, NYDFS was one of the first state financial regulators to impose cybersecurity requirements on covered entities. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
To test this, we classify U.S. states based on the percentage of voters who voted for the Republican or Democrat candidate in the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
One such way is by the filing of a motion to transfer venue under the doctrine of forum non conveniens under Pa.R.C.P. 1006(d)(1). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]