Search for: "State v. Starks" Results 521 - 540 of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Based in part on this assurance, the Supreme Court in February of this year dismissed the case, Clapper v. [read post]
’[10] This approach stands in stark contrast to the majority in Kiobel, who primarily rely on a misreading of footnote 20 to justify their misguided recourse to customary international law on the question of corporate liability. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 4:59 am by Just Security
Simon Offers Supreme Court Stark Choice by William S. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the long-running Exxon-Valdez case, Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 2:53 pm
Supreme Court decided the notorious Hawaiian land redistribution case, Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:38 pm
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Upcoming CLE event: The Impact of Iasenza v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:22 am by Jordan Vick and Jasmine Stanzick
This case is a stark reminder of the limits of non-disclosure agreements and that once disclosure is made, the ability to seek relief from subsequent users under a state’s trade secret act may become very difficult. [read post]